<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>FotoNest Journal</title>
    <link>https://fotoneststudio.com/blog</link>
    <description>Working notes on delivering event photos — what the tools in this category actually cost, how they bill, and what they do with face data.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 03:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://fotoneststudio.com/blog/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Best AI Photo Sharing Apps for Events (2026)</title>
      <link>https://fotoneststudio.com/blog/best-ai-photo-sharing-app-for-events</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fotoneststudio.com/blog/best-ai-photo-sharing-app-for-events</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Event photography</category>
      <description>A comparison of five AI event photo sharing apps — FotoNest, Kwikpic, FotoOwl, TurtlePic and Premagic — against the three criteria that decide the purchase: what one event costs in total, what you are billed for and for how long, and what happens to face data. Every figure was read from a page on the vendor’s own domain on 25 August 2026. A 1,000-photo event kept live for three months is $15 on FotoNest, billed once; Kwikpic and FotoOwl publish yearly plans, TurtlePic puts its price list behind a sign-in, and Premagic quotes after a demo.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
